From: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
When doing my reuseport rework I screwed up and changed a
if (hlist_empty(&tb->owners))
to
if (!hlist_empty(&tb->owners))
This is obviously bad as all of the reuseport/reuse logic was reversed,
which caused weird problems like allowing an ipv4 bind conflict if we
opened an ipv4 only socket on a port followed by an ipv6 only socket on
the same port.
Fixes: b9470c27607b ("inet: kill smallest_size and smallest_port")
Reported-by: Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
---
net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index a1bf30438bc5..c039c937ba90 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ int inet_csk_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum)
goto fail_unlock;
}
success:
- if (!hlist_empty(&tb->owners)) {
+ if (hlist_empty(&tb->owners)) {
tb->fastreuse = reuse;
if (sk->sk_reuseport) {
tb->fastreuseport = FASTREUSEPORT_ANY;
--
2.7.4
