On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 04:43:02PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Cc: Chris Mi <chr...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>

Hi Cong,

this looks like a nice enhancement to me. Did you measure any performance
benefit from it.  Perhaps it could be described in the changelog_ I also
have a more detailed question below.

> ---
>  net/sched/cls_u32.c | 108 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_u32.c b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> index 10b8d851fc6b..316b8a791b13 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_u32.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@

...

> @@ -937,22 +940,33 @@ static int u32_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff 
> *in_skb,
>                       return -EINVAL;
>               if (TC_U32_KEY(handle))
>                       return -EINVAL;
> -             if (handle == 0) {
> -                     handle = gen_new_htid(tp->data);
> -                     if (handle == 0)
> -                             return -ENOMEM;
> -             }
>               ht = kzalloc(sizeof(*ht) + divisor*sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (ht == NULL)
>                       return -ENOBUFS;
> +             if (handle == 0) {
> +                     handle = gen_new_htid(tp->data, ht);
> +                     if (handle == 0) {
> +                             kfree(ht);
> +                             return -ENOMEM;
> +                     }
> +             } else {
> +                     err = idr_alloc_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, ht, NULL,
> +                                         handle, handle + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +                     if (err) {
> +                             kfree(ht);
> +                             return err;
> +                     }

The above seems to check that handle is not already in use and mark it as
in use. But I don't see that logic in the code prior to this patch.
Am I missing something? If not perhaps this portion should be a separate
patch or described in the changelog.

> +             }
>               ht->tp_c = tp_c;
>               ht->refcnt = 1;
>               ht->divisor = divisor;
>               ht->handle = handle;
>               ht->prio = tp->prio;
> +             idr_init(&ht->handle_idr);
>  
>               err = u32_replace_hw_hnode(tp, ht, flags);
>               if (err) {
> +                     idr_remove_ext(&tp_c->handle_idr, handle);
>                       kfree(ht);
>                       return err;
>               }

...

Reply via email to