From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> Ido reported following splat and provided a patch.
[ 122.221814] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sshd/2672 [ 122.221845] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [ 122.221866] CPU: 0 PID: 2672 Comm: sshd Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3-idosch-next-custom #639 [ 122.221880] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 122.221893] Call Trace: [ 122.221919] dump_stack+0xb1/0x10c [ 122.221946] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x124/0x124 [ 122.221974] ? ___ratelimit+0xfe/0x240 [ 122.222020] check_preemption_disabled+0x173/0x1b0 [ 122.222060] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [ 122.222083] ip6_pol_route+0x1482/0x24a0 ... I believe we can simplify this code path a bit, since we no longer hold a read_lock and need to release it to avoid a dead lock. By disabling BH, we make sure we'll prevent code re-entry and rt6_get_pcpu_route()/rt6_make_pcpu_route() run on the same cpu. Fixes: 66f5d6ce53e6 ("ipv6: replace rwlock with rcu and spinlock in fib6_table") Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> --- net/ipv6/route.c | 26 ++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 399d1bceec4a6e6736c367e706dd2acbd4093d58..606e80325b21c0e10a02e9c7d5b3fcfbfc26a003 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -1136,15 +1136,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_make_pcpu_route(struct rt6_info *rt) dst_hold(&pcpu_rt->dst); p = this_cpu_ptr(rt->rt6i_pcpu); prev = cmpxchg(p, NULL, pcpu_rt); - if (prev) { - /* If someone did it before us, return prev instead */ - /* release refcnt taken by ip6_rt_pcpu_alloc() */ - dst_release_immediate(&pcpu_rt->dst); - /* release refcnt taken by above dst_hold() */ - dst_release_immediate(&pcpu_rt->dst); - dst_hold(&prev->dst); - pcpu_rt = prev; - } + BUG_ON(prev); rt6_dst_from_metrics_check(pcpu_rt); return pcpu_rt; @@ -1739,31 +1731,25 @@ struct rt6_info *ip6_pol_route(struct net *net, struct fib6_table *table, struct rt6_info *pcpu_rt; dst_use_noref(&rt->dst, jiffies); + local_bh_disable(); pcpu_rt = rt6_get_pcpu_route(rt); - if (pcpu_rt) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - } else { + if (!pcpu_rt) { /* atomic_inc_not_zero() is needed when using rcu */ if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&rt->rt6i_ref)) { - /* We have to do the read_unlock first - * because rt6_make_pcpu_route() may trigger - * ip6_dst_gc() which will take the write_lock. - * - * No dst_hold() on rt is needed because grabbing + /* No dst_hold() on rt is needed because grabbing * rt->rt6i_ref makes sure rt can't be released. */ - rcu_read_unlock(); pcpu_rt = rt6_make_pcpu_route(rt); rt6_release(rt); } else { /* rt is already removed from tree */ - rcu_read_unlock(); pcpu_rt = net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry; dst_hold(&pcpu_rt->dst); } } - + local_bh_enable(); + rcu_read_unlock(); trace_fib6_table_lookup(net, pcpu_rt, table->tb6_id, fl6); return pcpu_rt; }