From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:25:45 -0700
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 01:19:17 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> Buffer length passed into this hook is always IFNAMSIZ which is 16. >> >> Code savings on x86_64: >> >> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/9 up/down: 2/-45 (-43) >> function old new delta >> rocker_cmd_get_port_settings_phys_name_proc 179 181 +2 >> rocker_port_get_phys_port_name 62 61 -1 >> mlxsw_sx_port_get_phys_port_name 54 50 -4 >> mlx5e_rep_get_phys_port_name 61 57 -4 >> efx_get_phys_port_name 50 46 -4 >> dsa_slave_get_phys_port_name 54 50 -4 >> bnxt_vf_rep_get_phys_port_name 69 65 -4 >> bnxt_get_phys_port_name 70 65 -5 >> mlxsw_sp_port_get_phys_port_name 116 107 -9 >> nfp_port_get_phys_port_name 180 170 -10 >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com> > > I don't think the gains justify the additional burden on backports. Yeah I agree, this one is not really worth the pain.
