In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that for options.c file, I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
net/dccp/input.c | 1 +
net/dccp/options.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/dccp/input.c b/net/dccp/input.c
index fa6be97..d28d46b 100644
--- a/net/dccp/input.c
+++ b/net/dccp/input.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static int dccp_rcv_respond_partopen_state_process(struct
sock *sk,
case DCCP_PKT_DATA:
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_RESPOND)
break;
+ /* fall through */
case DCCP_PKT_DATAACK:
case DCCP_PKT_ACK:
/*
diff --git a/net/dccp/options.c b/net/dccp/options.c
index 51cdfc3..4e40db0 100644
--- a/net/dccp/options.c
+++ b/net/dccp/options.c
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct
dccp_request_sock *dreq,
* Ack vectors are processed by the TX CCID if it is
* interested. The RX CCID need not parse Ack Vectors,
* since it is only interested in clearing old state.
- * Fall through.
*/
+ /* fall through */
case DCCPO_MIN_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC ... DCCPO_MAX_TX_CCID_SPECIFIC:
if (ccid_hc_tx_parse_options(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk,
pkt_type, opt, value, len))
--
2.7.4
