Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:15:09PM CEST, broo...@kernel.org wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build
>(x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c: In function
>'fl_hw_destroy_filter':
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:208:12: error: 'struct
>tc_cls_flower_offload' has no member named 'egress_dev'
> cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
> ^
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:208:27: error: 'struct
>cls_fl_filter' has no member named 'hw_dev'
> cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
> ^
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c: In function
>'fl_hw_update_stats':
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:270:12: error: 'struct
>tc_cls_flower_offload' has no member named 'egress_dev'
> cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
> ^
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:270:27: error: 'struct
>cls_fl_filter' has no member named 'hw_dev'
> cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
This fix ("net/sched: cls_flower: Set egress_dev mark when calling into the HW
driver")
went to -net tree, should not go to -next. Apparently there is some mixup.
DaveM?
> ^
>/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/scripts/Makefile.build:319: recipe for target
>'net/sched/cls_flower.o' failed
>
>Caused by commit
>
> 7578d7b45ed870b13a8ace57e32feaed623c2a94 ("net/sched: cls_flower: Set
> egress_dev mark when calling into the HW driver")
>
>interacting with
>
> 7578d7b45ed870b1 ("net: sched: remove unused tcf_exts_get_dev helper and
> cls_flower->egress_dev")
>
>both in the net-next tree. Falling back to previous net-next trees
>introduced other issues so I reverted that commit for today.
