On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 07:49:58PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:00:36 -0700 > Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +0000 > > > Humberto Alves <hjal...@live.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, just get rid of this 'if statement'. > > > > in6addr_any should be represented as '::', not '*'. Otherwise it's > > > > impossible to distinguish IPv4 listening addresses from IPv6. Thank you > > > > :) > > > > > > But IPv6 accepts IPv4 as well. > > > > Not always (IPV6_V6ONLY socket option) > > > > I agree that this recent change in ss is problematic. > > > > Please give us back a way to distinguish IPV6 and IPv4 > > What about > *:80 << both IPV6 and IPV4 > [::]:80 << IPV6_ONLY > 0.0.0.0:80 << IPV4_ONLY
Assuming that this will be distinguished based on INET_DIAG_SKV6ONLY attribute, tc will then use the asterisk for v6only sockets on older kernels not supporting the feature. Fine with me, just a heads-up! Cheers, Phil
