From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsi...@embeddedor.com> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:02:44 -0500
> @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct > *work) > case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1: > if (rxflags->peer_done_writing) > sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2; > - /* fall through to check for closing */ > + /* to check for closing */ > + /* fall through */ Gustavo please look at what you are doing to the code. This was a nice easy to read sentence in the comment, and now you've chopped it up into two pieces and made it awkward and more difficult to read.
