Hi Markus,

On 10/27/2017 10:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:22:24 +0200

* Add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better
   reused at the end of this function.

* Adjust two condition checks.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
  drivers/net/can/vxcan.c | 16 ++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
index 8404e8852a0f..97f250cbc4ff 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
@@ -227,10 +227,8 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net *net, struct 
net_device *dev,
        netif_carrier_off(peer);
err = rtnl_configure_link(peer, ifmp);
-       if (err < 0) {
-               unregister_netdevice(peer);
-               return err;
-       }
+       if (err)
+               goto unregister_network_device;

You are changing semantic in the if-statement here.

I would be fine with the patch if you revert that if-statement as I would like to stay on the behavior from veth.c in veth_newlink().

Regards,
Oliver

/* register first device */
        if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME])
@@ -239,10 +237,8 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net *net, struct 
net_device *dev,
                snprintf(dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, DRV_NAME "%%d");
err = register_netdevice(dev);
-       if (err < 0) {
-               unregister_netdevice(peer);
-               return err;
-       }
+       if (err)
+               goto unregister_network_device;
netif_carrier_off(dev); @@ -254,6 +250,10 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
        rcu_assign_pointer(priv->peer, dev);
return 0;
+
+unregister_network_device:
+       unregister_netdevice(peer);
+       return err;
  }
static void vxcan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)

Reply via email to