On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
> 
> In sch_handle_egress and sch_handle_ingress tp->q is used only in order
> to update stats. So stats and filter list are the only things that are
> needed in clsact qdisc fastpath processing. Introduce new mini_Qdisc
> struct to hold those items. Also, introduce a helper to swap the
> mini_Qdisc structures in case filter list head changes.
> 
> This removes need for tp->q usage without added overhead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> - Using head change callback to replace miniq pointer every time tp head
>   changes. This eliminates one rcu dereference and makes the claim "without
>   added overhead" valid.

you kidding, right?
It's still two loads.

> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 24ac908..1423cf4 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3274,22 +3274,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_loopback_xmit);
>  static struct sk_buff *
>  sch_handle_egress(struct sk_buff *skb, int *ret, struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> -     struct tcf_proto *cl = rcu_dereference_bh(dev->egress_cl_list);
> +     struct mini_Qdisc *miniq = rcu_dereference_bh(dev->miniq_egress);
>       struct tcf_result cl_res;
>  
> -     if (!cl)
> +     if (!miniq)
>               return skb;
>  
>       /* qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->pkt_len was already set by the caller. */
> -     qdisc_bstats_cpu_update(cl->q, skb);
> +     mini_qdisc_bstats_cpu_update(miniq, skb);
>  
> -     switch (tcf_classify(skb, cl, &cl_res, false)) {
> +     switch (tcf_classify(skb, miniq->filter_list, &cl_res, false)) {

I don't think it's great, but I don't have any suggestions on
how to avoid it, so I'm not objecting. Just disappointed that
you keep adding stuff to tc and messing with sw fast path only to
make parity with some obscure hw feature.
If it keeps going like this we'd need to come up with some new fast
hook for clsbpf in ingress/egress paths. We use it for
every packet, so extra loads are not great.
I guess they should be cache hits, but will take extra cache line.
All of the bugs in tc logic recently are not comforting either.

Reply via email to