On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:29:42AM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 12/31/17 9:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > To make IPv6 more in line with IPv4 we need to be able to respond > > differently to different netdev events. For example, when a netdev is > > unregistered all the routes using it as their nexthop device should be > > flushed, whereas when the netdev's carrier changes only the 'linkdown' > > flag should be toggled. > > > > Currently, this is not possible, as the function that traverses the > > routing tables is not aware of the triggering event. > > > > Propagate the triggering event down, so that it could be used in later > > patches. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > > --- > > include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 + > > net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 ++-- > > net/ipv6/route.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h > > index caad39198c2a..8205402ff3dc 100644 > > --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h > > +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h > > rt6_ifdown is done with this change, so the declaration of rt6_ifdown > can be removed from this file as well.
Yes, I missed that. grepping for `rt6_ifdown` I now see that I need to reword a comment referencing it in icmp6_dst_alloc(). Thanks
