The next patch is going to allow dead routes to remain in the FIB tree
in certain situations.

When this happens we need to be sure to bump the sernum of the nodes
where these are stored so that potential copies cached in sockets are
invalidated.

The function that performs this update assumes the table lock is not
taken when it is invoked, but that will not be the case when it is
invoked by the tree walker.

Have the function assume the lock is taken and make the single caller
take the lock itself.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 5 +----
 net/ipv6/route.c   | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index c1bbe7bf9fdd..edda5ad3b405 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -107,16 +107,13 @@ enum {
 
 void fib6_update_sernum(struct rt6_info *rt)
 {
-       struct fib6_table *table = rt->rt6i_table;
        struct net *net = dev_net(rt->dst.dev);
        struct fib6_node *fn;
 
-       spin_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
        fn = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->rt6i_node,
-                       lockdep_is_held(&table->tb6_lock));
+                       lockdep_is_held(&rt->rt6i_table->tb6_lock));
        if (fn)
                fn->fn_sernum = fib6_new_sernum(net);
-       spin_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index f62d24948aa2..a3bfce71c861 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1353,7 +1353,9 @@ static int rt6_insert_exception(struct rt6_info *nrt,
 
        /* Update fn->fn_sernum to invalidate all cached dst */
        if (!err) {
+               spin_lock_bh(&ort->rt6i_table->tb6_lock);
                fib6_update_sernum(ort);
+               spin_unlock_bh(&ort->rt6i_table->tb6_lock);
                fib6_force_start_gc(net);
        }
 
-- 
2.14.3

Reply via email to