Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:59:10PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote: >On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> >wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:48:54PM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>On 1/15/18 11:18 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>>> index bb423371f4de..264bf0af4c4d 100644 >>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh >>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ if [[ ! -x "$(command -v jq)" ]]; then >>>>> exit 0 >>>>> fi >>>>> >>>>> +if [[ ! -x "$(command -v mausezahn)" ]]; then >>>>> + echo "SKIP: mausezahn not installed" >>>>> + exit 0 >>>>> +fi >>>>> + >>>> >>>>The checks are good, but hitting a collision with this one: >>>>$ ./router.sh >>>>SKIP: mausezahn not installed >>>> >>>>For debian, it is mz not mausezahn. >>> >>> That is weird. If you look at the sources, the binary name is >>> "mausezahn". Looks like debian is doing some renaming :/ >>> >> >> I have seen/used both versions. Debian packages from some old upstream >> source which calls it mz. >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/mz >> >> I have used latest mz (with ipv6 support etc) from netsniff-ng which >> builds it as mausezahn. > > >actually Debian also builds >https://packages.debian.org/sid/netsniff-ng and installs 'mausezahn' > >so you might have to check and use which exists... (mausezahn overriding mz).
I believe we can stick with mausezahn, since it is apparently available on Debian too.
