On 01/18/2018 10:35 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > There is a static checker warning that "proglen" has an upper bound but > no lower bound. The allocation will just fail harmlessly so it's not a > big deal. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Applied to bpf-next, thanks Dan! (I changed the prefix from 'tools/bpftool' into 'tools/bpf_jit_disasm' since it's not touching bpftool here.)
