>Something looks wrong here?! The commit message talks about bit 18, 19 and 20. >However, 0x0800, 0x1000, 0x2000 and are like bit 11, 12 and 13? Furthermore, >what about the EMAC_STACR_STAC_MASK? shouldn't it be 0x1800 now (or delete it >since it doesn't look like it's used anywhere?). Christian, nope, it's all fine there, it's big endian. This commit related only to write operation, I'll check MASK and see what I can do with that.
- [PATCH 2/2] net/ibm/emac: wrong bit is used for STA co... Ivan Mikhaylov
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/ibm/emac: wrong bit is used f... Christian Lamparter
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/ibm/emac: wrong bit is us... Ivan Mikhaylov
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/ibm/emac: wrong bit i... Christian Lamparter
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/ibm/emac: wrong b... Ivan Mikhaylov