Hey Florian & Co,
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 18:26 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 14:36 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> > > b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> > > index b686e2ce9c0e..3723f8f419aa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> > > @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ static void iscsi_target_sk_data_ready(struct sock
> > > *sk)
> > > if (test_and_set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags)) {
> > > write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> > > pr_debug("Got LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE=1, conn: %p >>>>\n",
> > > conn);
> > > + if (WARN_ON(iscsi_target_sk_data_ready ==
> > > conn->orig_data_ready))
> > > + return;
> >
> > Is this WARN_ON() belonging to this fix ?
> > At least make it WARN_ON_ONCE() or pr_err_once()
>
> Nicholas, I don't know this code at all so it would be good if you could
> give advice here (omit all together, WARN_ON_ONCE, ...).
>
This is regular behavior during multi PDU login sequences, and should
not include a WARN_ON.
So with MNC's Tested-by in place, applying to target-pending/for-next
minus the WARN_ON, with a extra 4.14.y stable tag.
Thanks again for taking a look at this.
To your earlier point wrt net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1 on 4.13 code not
triggering pre-queue logic. From groking the original patch to drop
prequeue I agree this should really be the case, but am still at a loss
how MNC is triggering on 4.14+ unless something else has changed to
uncover this iscsi-target bug.
Still curious to verify the root cause, but I haven't been able to
reproduce this in VMs on small scale, and haven't had cycles to
reproduce on HW yet.
That said, since the bug appears to be masked on <= 4.13.y +
tcp_low_latency=1, unless someone can reproduce this on earlier code
with tcp_low_latency=0, I'll leave off the older stable tag for now.
