On 02/04/2018 10:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:56:14 +0100 > Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote: > >> Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all against such tool or test, I think >> it's a great idea and needed. I just think that tools/lib/bpf/ is not >> the right place to put it into lib directory. Right now, as you say, >> it's a mixture of example code on how to use the lib, and tool at the >> same time to dump/test load an object file with libbpf. > > Okay, to avoid polluting the directory of the library with test/samples > programs, bow for your suggestion of moving the file to the selftests > directory. > > I'm at FOSDEM now, and I cannot send a V2 patch right now... If you > need this in fast (due merge timing), you can make the change yourself > and apply it... else I'll send a V2 on Tuesday.
Okay, then lets go with Tuesday since currently bpf pull-request is still pending, thus this fix would go out with the next one anyway. Thanks, Daniel
