Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: > rateest_hash is supposed to be protected by xt_rateest_mutex, > and, as suggested by Eric, lookup and insert should be atomic, > so we should acquire the xt_rateest_mutex once for both. > > So introduce a non-locking helper for internal use and keep the > locking one for external.
Looks good, thanks Cong. Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
