On Wednesday 06 September 2006 22:55, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 04:00:05PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 06:51 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > > > > I don't know about the others, but long/short retry limits have users > > > (e.g., Host AP driver) and these drivers are currently forced to use a > > > hack to do this without this cleanup. Furthermore, this part does not > > > add a new ioctl. > > > > It does, however, add new parameters and things that'd need to be > > translated in the compat layer later. Hence, even there, I'd prefer to > > add them directly into nl80211. However, the compat code for that > > shouldn't be that bad, so I can see that as a softer target :) But I > > don't want to see new ioctls for sure. > > OK, I think we all agree that there are good parts to Jean's WE-21 > patch. Below I've made an attempt to separate the wheat from the chaff > (or to cut the baby in half)... > > Is this patch acceptable to the group? Does it make things better? > Or worse? Did I leave-out anything that should still go in? Did I > take too much? > > Let me know what you think...?
I am OK with this. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
