On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com> wrote: > > Oleksandr, > > > > Thanks for the detailed report! Yes, this sounds like an issue in BBR. We > > have not run into this one in our team, but we will try to work with you to > > fix this. > > > > Would you be able to take a sender-side tcpdump trace of the slow BBR > > transfer ("v4.13 + BBR + fq_codel == Not OK")? Packet headers only would be > > fine. Maybe something like: > > > > tcpdump -w /tmp/test.pcap -c1000000 -s 100 -i eth0 port $PORT > > > > Thanks! > > neal > > On baremetal and using latest net tree, I get pretty normal results at > least, on 40Gbit NIC,
Eric raises a good question: bare metal vs VMs. Oleksandr, your first email mentioned KVM VMs and virtio NICs. Your second e-mail did not seem to mention if those results were for bare metal or a VM scenario: can you please clarify the details on your second set of tests? Thanks!