From: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:59:49 +0100

> After commit 3f34cfae1238 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock
> only in the required scope"), the caller of nf_{get/set}sockopt() must
> not hold any lock, but, in such changeset, I forgot to cope with DECnet.
> 
> This commit addresses the issue moving the nf call outside the lock,
> in the dn_{get,set}sockopt() with the same schema currently used by
> ipv4 and ipv6. Also moves the unhandled sockopts of the end of the main
> switch statements, to improve code readability.
> 
> Reported-by: Petr Vandrovec <p...@vandrovec.name>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198791#c2
> Fixes: 3f34cfae1238 ("netfilter: on sockopt() acquire sock lock only in the 
> required scope")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>

Applied, thank you.

Reply via email to