On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksa...@natalenko.name> wrote: > On úterý 20. února 2018 20:39:49 CET Eric Dumazet wrote: >> I am not trying to compare BBR and Reno on a lossless link. >> >> Reno is running as fast as possible and will win when bufferbloat is >> not an issue. >> >> If bufferbloat is not an issue, simply use Reno and be happy ;) >> >> My patch helps BBR only, I thought it was obvious ;) > > Umm, yes, and my point was rather something like "the speed on a lossless link > while using BBR with and without this patch is the same". Sorry for a > confusion. I guess, the key word here is "lossless".
That is with the other patches _not_ applied ? Here the gain is quite big, since BBR can setup a slightly better cwnd, allowing proper GRO on receiver.
