> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 16:40:40 +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > +static struct {
> > + int pkt_size;
> > + int buf_num;
> > +} mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_POOLS_NUM];
>
> Any reason for not doing:
>
> } mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_POOLS_NUM] = {
> [MVPP2_BM_SHORT] = {
> .pkt_size = MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE,
> .buf_num = MVPP2_BM_SHORT_BUF_NUM
> },
> [MVPP2_BM_LONG] = {
> .pkt_size = MVPP2_BM_LONG_PKT_SIZE,
> .buf_num = MVPP2_BM_LONG_BUF_NUM,
> },
> };
>
> And get rid of:
>
> > +static void mvpp2_setup_bm_pool(void) {
> > + /* Short pool */
> > + mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_SHORT].buf_num =
> MVPP2_BM_SHORT_BUF_NUM;
> > + mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_SHORT].pkt_size =
> MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE;
> > +
> > + /* Long pool */
> > + mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_LONG].buf_num =
> MVPP2_BM_LONG_BUF_NUM;
> > + mvpp2_pools[MVPP2_BM_LONG].pkt_size =
> MVPP2_BM_LONG_PKT_SIZE; }
>
> ?
>
No, we can change it.
Stefan.
