The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support.  The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a
pass.

Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.rox...@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void)
 {
        int *rcv_fd, nodes;
 
-       if (numa_available() < 0)
-               error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+       if (numa_available() < 0) {
+               fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support");
+               return 0;
+       }
 
        nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;
 
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to