On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:27:42 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/25/18 12:35 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:02:45 -0600, David Ahern wrote:  
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile 
> >>>> b/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
> >>>> index 09388c06171d..449b2a1a1800 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -9,3 +9,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL),y)
> >>>>  netdevsim-objs += \
> >>>>          bpf.o
> >>>>  endif
> >>>> +
> >>>> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK),)    
> >>>
> >>> Hm.  Don't you need MAY_USE_DEVLINK dependency perhaps?    
> >>
> >> mlxsw uses CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK in its Makefile.
> >>
> >> MAY_USE_DEVLINK seems to only be used in Kconfig files. Not clear to me
> >> why it is needed at all.  
> > 
> > NETDEVSIM=y && DEVLINK=m
> >   
> 
> ok. I purposely did not add DEVLINK as a dependency to netdevsim to make
> the resource controller truly optional. Can add it if you prefer.

Oh, no, I don't mind.  I just thought NETDEVSIM=y DEVLINK=m case will
break the build, but I haven't tested.  If it works perfect, let's not
add unnecessary dependencies :)

(FWIW the MAY_USE_DEVLINK dep is basically depend on DEVLINK ||
DEVLINK=n, so one can still build without devlink but if devlink is a
module netdevsim will also have to be.)

Reply via email to