On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 01:16:45AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> vlan_vids_add_by_dev is called right after dev hwaddr sync, so on
> the err path it should unsync dev hwaddr. Otherwise, the slave
> dev's hwaddr will never be unsync when this err happens.
> 
> Fixes: 1ff412ad7714 ("bonding: change the bond's vlan syncing functions with 
> the standard ones")
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <a...@greyhouse.net>

> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index c669554..0c299de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1565,7 +1565,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct 
> net_device *slave_dev,
>       if (res) {
>               netdev_err(bond_dev, "Couldn't add bond vlan ids to %s\n",
>                          slave_dev->name);
> -             goto err_close;
> +             goto err_hwaddr_unsync;
>       }
>  
>       prev_slave = bond_last_slave(bond);
> @@ -1755,9 +1755,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct 
> net_device *slave_dev,
>       netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>  
>  err_detach:
> -     if (!bond_uses_primary(bond))
> -             bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
> -
>       vlan_vids_del_by_dev(slave_dev, bond_dev);
>       if (rcu_access_pointer(bond->primary_slave) == new_slave)
>               RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->primary_slave, NULL);
> @@ -1771,6 +1768,10 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct 
> net_device *slave_dev,
>       synchronize_rcu();
>       slave_disable_netpoll(new_slave);
>  
> +err_hwaddr_unsync:
> +     if (!bond_uses_primary(bond))
> +             bond_hw_addr_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
> +
>  err_close:
>       slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BONDING;
>       dev_close(slave_dev);

Reply via email to