Current suspend/resume implementation reuses the mvneta_open() and
mvneta_close(), but it could be optimized to take only necessary
actions during suspend/resume.

One obvious problem of current implementation is: after hundreds of
system suspend/resume cycles, the resume of mvneta could fail due to
fragmented dma coherent memory. After this patch, the non-necessary
memory alloc/free is optimized out.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jisheng.zh...@synaptics.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index f96815853108..cb7fce99ed6d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -4586,16 +4586,43 @@ static int mvneta_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int mvneta_suspend(struct device *device)
 {
+       int queue;
        struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
        struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
 
-       rtnl_lock();
-       if (netif_running(dev))
-               mvneta_stop(dev);
-       rtnl_unlock();
+       if (!netif_running(dev))
+               goto clean_exit;
+
+       if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+               spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+               pp->is_stopped = true;
+               spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+
+               cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+                                                   &pp->node_online);
+               cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+                                                   &pp->node_dead);
+       }
+
+       mvneta_stop_dev(pp);
+
+       for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+               struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+               mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(pp, rxq);
+       }
+
+       for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+               struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+               mvneta_txq_hw_deinit(pp, txq);
+       }
+
+clean_exit:
        netif_device_detach(dev);
        clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk_bus);
        clk_disable_unprepare(pp->clk);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4604,7 +4631,7 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
        struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(device);
        struct net_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
        struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
-       int err;
+       int err, queue;
 
        clk_prepare_enable(pp->clk);
        if (!IS_ERR(pp->clk_bus))
@@ -4626,12 +4653,36 @@ static int mvneta_resume(struct device *device)
        }
 
        netif_device_attach(dev);
-       rtnl_lock();
-       if (netif_running(dev)) {
-               mvneta_open(dev);
-               mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
+
+       if (!netif_running(dev))
+               return 0;
+
+       for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
+               struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
+
+               rxq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+               mvneta_rxq_hw_init(pp, rxq);
        }
-       rtnl_unlock();
+
+       for (queue = 0; queue < txq_number; queue++) {
+               struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[queue];
+
+               txq->next_desc_to_proc = 0;
+               mvneta_txq_hw_init(pp, txq);
+       }
+
+       if (!pp->neta_armada3700) {
+               spin_lock(&pp->lock);
+               pp->is_stopped = false;
+               spin_unlock(&pp->lock);
+               cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(online_hpstate,
+                                                &pp->node_online);
+               cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
+                                                &pp->node_dead);
+       }
+
+       mvneta_start_dev(pp);
+       mvneta_set_rx_mode(dev);
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.16.3

Reply via email to