> Am 09.04.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>: [...]
>> May I completely misunderstood you, so correct my if I'am wrong: >> >> - ./scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py : produces reST markup from C-comments >> - ./scripts/kerne-doc : produces reST markup from C-comments >> >> IMO: both are doing the same job, so why not using kernel-doc? > > They are not really doing the same job, in bpf_helpers_doc.py case you don't > want the whole header rendered, but just a fraction of it, that is, the > single big comment which describes all BPF helper functions that a BPF > program developer has available to use in user space - aka the entries in > the __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER() macro; > I also doubt the latter would actually qualify > in kdoc context as some sort of a function description. latter .. ah, OK .. thanks for clarifying. -- Markus --
