On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2018-04-18 21:31, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Add container ID auxiliary records to secure computing and abnormal end >> > standalone records. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > kernel/auditsc.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c >> > index 7103d23..2f02ed9 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c >> > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c >> > @@ -2571,6 +2571,7 @@ static void audit_log_task(struct audit_buffer *ab) >> > void audit_core_dumps(long signr) >> > { >> > struct audit_buffer *ab; >> > + struct audit_context *context = audit_alloc_local(); >> >> Looking quickly at do_coredump() I *believe* we can use current here. >> >> > if (!audit_enabled) >> > return; >> > @@ -2578,19 +2579,22 @@ void audit_core_dumps(long signr) >> > if (signr == SIGQUIT) /* don't care for those */ >> > return; >> > >> > - ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND); >> > + ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND); >> > if (unlikely(!ab)) >> > return; >> > audit_log_task(ab); >> > audit_log_format(ab, " sig=%ld res=1", signr); >> > audit_log_end(ab); >> > + audit_log_container_info(context, "abend", >> > audit_get_containerid(current)); >> > + audit_free_context(context); >> > } >> > >> > void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code) >> > { >> > struct audit_buffer *ab; >> > + struct audit_context *context = audit_alloc_local(); >> >> We can definitely use current here. > > Ok, so both syscall aux records. That elimintes this patch from the > set, can go in independently.
Yep. It should help shrink the audit container ID patchset and perhaps more importantly it should put some distance between the connected-record debate and the audit container ID debate. I understand we are going to need a "local" context for some things, the network packets are probably the best example, but whenever possible I would like to connect these records back to a task's context. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com