>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-rdma- >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Duyck >Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 2:07 PM >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Cc: [email protected]; Dalessandro, Dennis ><[email protected]>; Vishwanathapura, Niranjana ><[email protected]>; [email protected] >Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mlx4: Don't bother using skb_tx_hash in >mlx4_en_select_queue > >The code in the fallback path has supported XDP in conjunction with the Tx >traffic classification for TCs for over a year now. So instead of just >calling skb_tx_hash for every packet we are better off using the fallback >since that will record the Tx queue to the socket and then that can be used >instead of having to recompute the hash every time. > >Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]> >--- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c >b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c >index 6b68537..0227786 100644 >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c >@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ u16 mlx4_en_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, >struct sk_buff *skb, > u16 rings_p_up = priv->num_tx_rings_p_up; > > if (netdev_get_num_tc(dev)) >- return skb_tx_hash(dev, skb); >+ return fallback(dev, skb); > > return fallback(dev, skb) % rings_p_up;
Hi Alexander, The final return fallback() call is doing a % rings_p_up. Do you need to do that for the new fallback() call? Maybe you can get rid of the netdev_get_num_tc() call altogether? Thanks, Mike > } > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in >the body of a message to [email protected] >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
