2018-03-13 21:06 GMT+01:00 Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>: > On 03/13/2018 12:58 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: >> Hi Salvatore, >> >> Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesorac...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> dsa_switch's num_ports is currently fixed to DSA_MAX_PORTS. So we avoid >>> 2 VLAs[1] by using DSA_MAX_PORTS instead of ds->num_ports. >>> >>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesorac...@gmail.com> >> >> NAK. >> >> We are in the process to remove hardcoded limits such as DSA_MAX_PORTS >> and DSA_MAX_SWITCHES, so we have to stick with ds->num_ports. > > Then this means that we need to allocate a bitmap from the heap, which > sounds a bit superfluous and could theoretically fail... not sure which > way is better, but bumping the size to DSA_MAX_PORTS definitively does > help people working on enabling -Wvla.
Hi Florian, Should I consider this patch still NAKed or not? Should I resend the patch with some modifications? Thank you, Salvatore