On 05/17/2018 04:23 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > We don't do full parsing of SACKs, no; we were trying to keep things > simple... We do detect the presence of SACK options, though, and the > presence of SACK options on an ACK will make previous ACKs be considered > redundant. > But they are not redundant in some cases, particularly when reorders happen in the network.
