> > As for the rest of the network labeling, please work > together with Venkat > > and the SELinux developers on a final patchset which meets > all of the > > design goals and has been tested, with policy which has been merged > > upstream and is available via Fedora devel. Please keep > the discussion > > going, but ensure that the final patchset for review and merge > > consideration is a complete set against the current git > kernel coming from > > one person. > > I'm trying :) When I posted the NetLabel secid support patch > last week > I asked Venkat if he could merge it with the main secid > patchset (due to > size and dependencies that seemed like the most reasonable course of > action). For reasons I'm not aware of he chose not to.
FYI- I am no NetLabel expert, and the pathset I sent out that day included the peersid changes. And since you were going to have to post a patch for that again, I thought it best you ported and reposted the entire patch again. > As a result I > keep posting updated patches backed against Venkat's latest and > incorporating the latest feedback. And let's keep this going like this on the selinux list. When all the testing is done and selinux ok's the patchsets, I will combine them and send them onto netdev. How does that sound? > > Venkat, can you please merge the latest my latest NetLabel > secid support > patch in with your next release? I would, but it currently is premature. As James says, let's get policy done, the design proven, and tested and then we will go to netdev with one patchset. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
