On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:55:58AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > index ca38a30fbe91..adc6ab2cf429 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > @@ -4433,6 +4433,11 @@ static int
> > mlxsw_sp_netdevice_port_upper_event(struct net_device *lower_dev,
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can not put a VLAN on an
> > OVS port");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + if (is_vlan_dev(upper_dev) &&
> > + vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper_dev) == 1) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Creating a VLAN device with
> > VID 1 is unsupported: VLAN 1 carries untagged traffic");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Hi Ido
>
> Would ENOTSUPP be a better return code. VLAN 1 is valid, you just
> don't support it.
OK, makes sense. We currently use EINVAL for such errors, but we can
convert to EOPNOTSUPP in net-next.
Thanks
