Hi,
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 11:06 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > +static void fl_mask_free(struct fl_flow_mask *mask)
> > +{
> > + rhashtable_destroy(&mask->ht);
>
> I don't believe you can call rhashtable_destroy() in BH
> context, it acquires a mutex...
Thank you for the review. You are right. Tomorrow (I'm on holiday
today) I'll look towards leverging tcf_queue_work() to schedule
fl_mask_free()/rhashtable_destroy() at a proper time.
Cheers,
Paolo
