From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:32:15 -0700

> From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> 
> After commit f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule
> delrule msgs into fib_nl2rule"), rule_exists got replaced by rule_find
> for existing rule lookup in both the add and del paths. While this
> is good for the delete path, it solves a few problems but opens up
> a few invalid key matches in the add path.
> 
> $ip -4 rule add table main tos 10 fwmark 1
> $ip -4 rule add table main tos 10
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
> 
> The problem here is rule_find does not check if the key masks in
> the new and old rule are the same and hence ends up matching a more
> secific rule. Rule key masks cannot be easily compared today without
> an elaborate if-else block. Its best to introduce key masks for easier
> and accurate rule comparison in the future. Until then, due to fear of
> regressions this patch re-introduces older loose rule_exists during add.
> Also fixes both rule_exists and rule_find to cover missing attributes.
> 
> Fixes: f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule delrule msgs 
> into fib_nl2rule")
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>

Applied, thanks for resolving all of these issues.

Reply via email to