On 07/09/2018 01:34 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> I am not sure if this is enough to fix the entire issue. Now it will
> fetch the length correctly but, what guarantees that when it tries to
> actually copy the key (tcf_action_dump_1), the same act_cookie pointer
> will be used? As in, can't the new re-fetch be different/smaller than
> the object used here?
>
Yes, this presumably should use rtnl_dereference()
RTNL should be held between tcf_action_shared_attrs_size() and
tcf_action_dump_1()
Although it might not be the case anymore, we keep changing this RTNL
requirement
in dump operations ;)
