On 2018/07/24 9:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:13:03 +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>
>> All oversized packets including GSO packets are dropped if XDP is
>> enabled on receiver side, so don't send such packets from peer.
>>
>> Drop TSO and SCTP fragmentation features so that veth devices themselves
>> segment packets with XDP enabled. Also cap MTU accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> 
> Is there any precedence for fixing up features and MTU like this?  Most
> drivers just refuse to install the program if settings are incompatible.

I don't know any precedence. I can refuse the program on installing it
when features and MTU are not appropriate. Is it preferred?
Note that with current implementation wanted_features are not touched so
features will be restored when the XDP program is removed. MTU will not
be restored though, as I do not remember the original MTU.


>> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
>> index 78fa08cb6e24..f5b72e937d9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
>> @@ -542,6 +542,23 @@ static int veth_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev)
>>      return iflink;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static netdev_features_t veth_fix_features(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                                       netdev_features_t features)
>> +{
>> +    struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +    struct net_device *peer;
>> +
>> +    peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
>> +    if (peer) {
>> +            struct veth_priv *peer_priv = netdev_priv(peer);
>> +
>> +            if (peer_priv->_xdp_prog)
>> +                    features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return features;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void veth_set_rx_headroom(struct net_device *dev, int new_hr)
>>  {
>>      struct veth_priv *peer_priv, *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> @@ -591,14 +608,33 @@ static int veth_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct 
>> bpf_prog *prog,
>>                              goto err;
>>                      }
>>              }
>> +
>> +            if (!old_prog) {
>> +                    peer->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
>> +                    peer->max_mtu = PAGE_SIZE - VETH_XDP_HEADROOM -
>> +                            peer->hard_header_len -
>> +                            SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
>> +                    if (peer->mtu > peer->max_mtu)
>> +                            dev_set_mtu(peer, peer->max_mtu);
>> +            }
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (old_prog) {
>> -            if (!prog && dev->flags & IFF_UP)
>> -                    veth_disable_xdp(dev);
>> +            if (!prog) {
>> +                    if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
>> +                            veth_disable_xdp(dev);
>> +
>> +                    if (peer) {
>> +                            peer->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
>> +                            peer->max_mtu = ETH_MAX_MTU;
>> +                    }
>> +            }
>>              bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>>      }
>>  
>> +    if ((!!old_prog ^ !!prog) && peer)
>> +            netdev_update_features(peer);
>> +
>>      return 0;
>>  err:
>>      priv->_xdp_prog = old_prog;
>> @@ -643,6 +679,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops veth_netdev_ops = {
>>      .ndo_poll_controller    = veth_poll_controller,
>>  #endif
>>      .ndo_get_iflink         = veth_get_iflink,
>> +    .ndo_fix_features       = veth_fix_features,
>>      .ndo_features_check     = passthru_features_check,
>>      .ndo_set_rx_headroom    = veth_set_rx_headroom,
>>      .ndo_bpf                = veth_xdp,

-- 
Toshiaki Makita

Reply via email to