Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:13:20AM CEST, sae...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote: [...]
>> >> So after looking over the patch set the one thing I would ask for in >> this is some sort of documentation at a minimum. As a user I don't see >> how you can expect someone to be able to use this when the naming of >> things are pretty cryptic and there is no real explanation anywhere if >> you don't go through and read the patch description itself. When you >> start adding driver specific interfaces, you should at least start >> adding vendor specific documentation. >> > >Sure, sounds like a great idea, something like: >Documentation/networking/mlx5.txt and have a devlink section ? >or have a generic devlink doc and a mlx5 section in it ? I think that Documentation/networking/devlink/mlx5.txt would be good. We can have generic param description in: Documentation/networking/devlink/generic.txt
