From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> When chain 0 was implicitly created, removal of non-existent filter from chain 0 gave -ENOENT. Once chain 0 became non-implicit, the same call is giving -EINVAL. Fix this by returning -ENOENT in that case.
Reported-by: Roman Mashak <m...@mojatatu.com> Fixes: f71e0ca4db18 ("net: sched: Avoid implicit chain 0 creation") Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> --- net/sched/cls_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index 2d41c5b21b48..1a67af8a6e8c 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static int tc_del_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n, goto errout; } NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot find specified filter chain"); - err = -EINVAL; + err = -ENOENT; goto errout; } -- 2.14.4