On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:27:37 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> Would something like the patch below be better?
> It keeps the flush_scheduled_work() at the same location, but a second
> is added in case local->scan_work.data != sdata->dev

Applied to my tree, thanks for the patch!

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to