On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:27:37 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > Would something like the patch below be better? > It keeps the flush_scheduled_work() at the same location, but a second > is added in case local->scan_work.data != sdata->dev
Applied to my tree, thanks for the patch! Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
