On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Dawid Ciezarkiewicz wrote: > > Oh. I'm quite puzzled here. What is current policy? I'd like sysfs interfaces > better than ioctl - they are much cleaner etc. - but I thought ioctl will be > better here because current bonding control uses ioctl and extending it is > much simpler.
I can't tell you for sure if there is a 'policy' about this, but I would encourage you to focus energy on sysfs rather than the ioctl interface. In the future I would guess more will begin to use sysfs rather than ifenslave. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
