From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>

Commonly, ethernet addresses are just using a policy of
        { .len = ETH_ALEN }
which leaves userspace free to send more data than it should,
which may hide bugs.

Introduce NLA_EXACT_LEN which checks for exact size, rejecting
the attribute if it's not exactly that length. Also add
NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN which requires the minimum length and will
warn on longer attributes, for backward compatibility.

Use these to define NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR (new strict policy) and
NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR_COMPAT (compatible policy with warning);
these are used like this:

    static const struct nla_policy <name>[...] = {
        [NL_ATTR_NAME] = NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR,
        ...
    };

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com>
---
v2: add only NLA_EXACT_LEN/NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN and build on top
    of that for ethernet address validation, so it can be extended
    for other types (e.g. IPv6 addresses)
---
 include/net/netlink.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 lib/nlattr.c          |  8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index b318b0a9f6c3..318b1ded3833 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ enum {
        NLA_S64,
        NLA_BITFIELD32,
        NLA_REJECT,
+       NLA_EXACT_LEN,
+       NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN,
        __NLA_TYPE_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -211,6 +213,10 @@ enum {
  *                         just like "All other"
  *    NLA_BITFIELD32       Unused
  *    NLA_REJECT           Unused
+ *    NLA_EXACT_LEN        Attribute must have exactly this length, otherwise
+ *                         it is rejected.
+ *    NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN   Attribute should have exactly this length, a warning
+ *                         is logged if it is longer, shorter is rejected.
  *    All other            Minimum length of attribute payload
  *
  * Meaning of `validation_data' field:
@@ -236,6 +242,13 @@ struct nla_policy {
        void            *validation_data;
 };
 
+#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(_len)     { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN, .len = _len }
+#define NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(_len)        { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN, \
+                                         .len = _len }
+
+#define NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR            NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN(ETH_ALEN)
+#define NLA_POLICY_ETH_ADDR_COMPAT     NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN_WARN(ETH_ALEN)
+
 /**
  * struct nl_info - netlink source information
  * @nlh: Netlink message header of original request
diff --git a/lib/nlattr.c b/lib/nlattr.c
index 36d74b079151..bb6fe5ed4ecf 100644
--- a/lib/nlattr.c
+++ b/lib/nlattr.c
@@ -82,12 +82,18 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int 
maxtype,
 
        BUG_ON(pt->type > NLA_TYPE_MAX);
 
-       if (nla_attr_len[pt->type] && attrlen != nla_attr_len[pt->type]) {
+       if ((nla_attr_len[pt->type] && attrlen != nla_attr_len[pt->type]) ||
+           (pt->type == NLA_EXACT_LEN_WARN && attrlen != pt->len)) {
                pr_warn_ratelimited("netlink: '%s': attribute type %d has an 
invalid length.\n",
                                    current->comm, type);
        }
 
        switch (pt->type) {
+       case NLA_EXACT_LEN:
+               if (attrlen != pt->len)
+                       return -ERANGE;
+               break;
+
        case NLA_REJECT:
                if (pt->validation_data && error_msg)
                        *error_msg = pt->validation_data;
-- 
2.14.4

Reply via email to