Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Ethernet encrypted bridging is old stuff:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/167
> http://www.arnor.net/encryptingbridge/
> 
> It never got accepted, mostly for the same reasons this proposal
> is a dead end.

>From what I can see in the brief description is that ccrypt is more general
as it is not limited to ethernet bridging code, UDP and AES.

Unfortunately I cannot find any replies to the announcement you've mentioned
and thus I am and was not aware of the objections to the encrypted bridging
idea.

I knew the encrypted bridging project before starting to think about ccrypt,
BTW.

-- 
Pawel Foremski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to