From: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>

IB device name is not stable and will be possible to rename in the
following patches, update SMC code to use IB index as a stable
identification.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_diag.c |  6 +++---
 net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
index dbf64a93d68a..ba8b5a5671ec 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff 
*skb,
                        .lnk[0].link_id = smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].link_id,
                };

-               memcpy(linfo.lnk[0].ibname,
-                      smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev->name,
-                      sizeof(smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev->name));
+               ib_device_get_name(smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev,
+                                  linfo.lnk[0].ibname);
+
                smc_gid_be16_convert(linfo.lnk[0].gid,
                                     smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].gid);
                smc_gid_be16_convert(linfo.lnk[0].peer_gid,
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
index 01c6ce042a1c..67aec5ce6112 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
@@ -70,15 +70,14 @@ struct smc_pnetentry {
        u8 ib_port;
 };

-/* Check if two RDMA device entries are identical. Use device name and port
+/* Check if two RDMA device entries are identical. Use device index and port
  * number for comparison.
  */
-static bool smc_pnet_same_ibname(struct smc_pnetentry *pnetelem, char *ibname,
-                                u8 ibport)
+static bool smc_pnet_same_ibindex(struct smc_pnetentry *pnetelem, u32 ibindex,
+                                 u8 ibport)
 {
        return pnetelem->ib_port == ibport &&
-              !strncmp(pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name, ibname,
-                       sizeof(pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name));
+              pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->index == ibindex;
 }

 /* Find a pnetid in the pnet table.
@@ -179,9 +178,9 @@ static int smc_pnet_enter(struct smc_pnetentry 
*new_pnetelem)
                             sizeof(new_pnetelem->pnet_name)) ||
                    !strncmp(pnetelem->ndev->name, new_pnetelem->ndev->name,
                             sizeof(new_pnetelem->ndev->name)) ||
-                   smc_pnet_same_ibname(pnetelem,
-                                        new_pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name,
-                                        new_pnetelem->ib_port)) {
+                   smc_pnet_same_ibindex(pnetelem,
+                                         new_pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->index,
+                                         new_pnetelem->ib_port)) {
                        dev_put(pnetelem->ndev);
                        goto found;
                }
@@ -227,10 +226,11 @@ static struct smc_ib_device *smc_pnet_find_ib(char 
*ib_name)

        spin_lock(&smc_ib_devices.lock);
        list_for_each_entry(ibdev, &smc_ib_devices.list, list) {
-               if (!strncmp(ibdev->ibdev->name, ib_name,
-                            sizeof(ibdev->ibdev->name))) {
+               char name[IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX] = {};
+
+               ib_device_get_name(ibdev->ibdev, name);
+               if (!strncmp(name, ib_name, IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX))
                        goto out;
-               }
        }
        ibdev = NULL;
 out:
@@ -267,6 +267,11 @@ static int smc_pnet_fill_entry(struct net *net, struct 
smc_pnetentry *pnetelem,
                goto error;

        rc = -EINVAL;
+       /* NOTE !!!: Sadly enough, but this is part of ABI.
+        * From day one, the accesses are performed with device names and not
+        * device indexes for both ETH and IB. It means that this function isn't
+        * reliable after device renaming.
+        */
        if (!tb[SMC_PNETID_IBNAME])
                goto error;
        rc = -ENOENT;
--
2.14.4

Reply via email to