Hi Daniel, On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:10 PM Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > I hope this this thread isn't too old to bring back to life. So it seems > > that Harini found that m88e1111 did not need this errata, and Cisco > > previously found that Harini's patch fixed m88e1112, we included it > > internally for that reason > > > > Now I'm getting reports that this errata fixes issues we're seeing on > > m88e1111. We see an interrupt storm without the errata, despite the errata > > not being defined in the datasheet. > > Is everybody actually using interrupts? It could be in one system > phylib is polling. >
Yes, we weren't using interrupts; we used phy poll. As I recall, the register and page combination was reserved and the access seemed to fail. It will be useful if we can the errata description or version details. I'll check if I can get any more information. Regards, Harini
