On 09/28/2018 11:24 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > Callers of bond_for_each_slave_rcu are expected to hold the rcu lock, > otherwise a trace like below is shown > > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 179 at net/core/dev.c:6567 > netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu+0x34/0x40 > CPU: 2 PID: 179 Comm: kworker/u16:15 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc5-backup+ #1 > > > Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <da...@codemonkey.org.uk> > You forgot to change patch title.
- bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller Dave Jones
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller David Miller
- bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller Dave Jones
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controll... Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_cont... Dave Jones
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll... Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_... Dave Jones
- bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller Dave Jones
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_cont... Eric Dumazet
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_cont... Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll... Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_... Dave Jones
- bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev Dave Jones
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_de... David Miller
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_de... Eran Ben Elisha
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_skb_o... Cong Wang
- Re: bond: take rcu lock in netpoll_send_s... Eran Ben Elisha