Don't hardcode the dummy program types to SOCKET_FILTER type, as this
prevents testing bpf_tail_call in conjunction with other program types.
Instead, use the program type specified in the test case.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <j...@wand.net.nz>
---
v3: New patch.
v4: No change.
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 31 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 6e0b3f148cdb..163fd1c0062c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -12652,18 +12652,18 @@ static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t
size_key,
return fd;
}
-static int create_prog_dummy1(void)
+static int create_prog_dummy1(enum bpf_map_type prog_type)
{
struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
};
- return bpf_load_program(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog,
+ return bpf_load_program(prog_type, prog,
ARRAY_SIZE(prog), "GPL", 0, NULL, 0);
}
-static int create_prog_dummy2(int mfd, int idx)
+static int create_prog_dummy2(enum bpf_map_type prog_type, int mfd, int idx)
{
struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, idx),
@@ -12674,11 +12674,12 @@ static int create_prog_dummy2(int mfd, int idx)
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
};
- return bpf_load_program(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog,
+ return bpf_load_program(prog_type, prog,
ARRAY_SIZE(prog), "GPL", 0, NULL, 0);
}
-static int create_prog_array(uint32_t max_elem, int p1key)
+static int create_prog_array(enum bpf_map_type prog_type, uint32_t max_elem,
+ int p1key)
{
int p2key = 1;
int mfd, p1fd, p2fd;
@@ -12690,8 +12691,8 @@ static int create_prog_array(uint32_t max_elem, int
p1key)
return -1;
}
- p1fd = create_prog_dummy1();
- p2fd = create_prog_dummy2(mfd, p2key);
+ p1fd = create_prog_dummy1(prog_type);
+ p2fd = create_prog_dummy2(prog_type, mfd, p2key);
if (p1fd < 0 || p2fd < 0)
goto out;
if (bpf_map_update_elem(mfd, &p1key, &p1fd, BPF_ANY) < 0)
@@ -12748,8 +12749,8 @@ static int create_cgroup_storage(bool percpu)
static char bpf_vlog[UINT_MAX >> 8];
-static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
- int *map_fds)
+static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_map_type prog_type,
+ struct bpf_insn *prog, int *map_fds)
{
int *fixup_map1 = test->fixup_map1;
int *fixup_map2 = test->fixup_map2;
@@ -12805,7 +12806,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct
bpf_insn *prog,
}
if (*fixup_prog1) {
- map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(4, 0);
+ map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 4, 0);
do {
prog[*fixup_prog1].imm = map_fds[4];
fixup_prog1++;
@@ -12813,7 +12814,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct
bpf_insn *prog,
}
if (*fixup_prog2) {
- map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(8, 7);
+ map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(prog_type, 8, 7);
do {
prog[*fixup_prog2].imm = map_fds[5];
fixup_prog2++;
@@ -12859,11 +12860,13 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test,
bool unpriv,
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
map_fds[i] = -1;
- do_test_fixup(test, prog, map_fds);
+ if (!prog_type)
+ prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER;
+ do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds);
prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog);
- fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
- prog, prog_len, test->flags &
F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
+ fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len,
+ test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
"GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1);
expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ?
--
2.17.1
