Getting people to use wpa_supplicant almost exclusivly as the interface
for wireless will improve a lot of things. One thing that might help
here is to do some work on the wpa_cli - to make it easier for the
startup scripts to do what they need, and also to make the command
syntax easier for command line users to do what they need.

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:33 AM
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Johannes Berg; Michael Wu; Simon Barber; David Kimdon;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; Jiri Benc; John W. Linville; Jean Tourrilhes;
Hong Liu; Jouni Malinen
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add Regulatory Domain support to d80211

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:04 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/26/06, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While wpa_supplicant is certainly the main client for stuff directly

> > related to setting up a connection, there are quite a few other 
> > users of general WE calls to pull information out of the card, or to

> > receive scan events.
> 
> How about we just ditch iwconfig completely and move on to 
> wpa_supplicant/wpa_cli as our next userspace application with
> nl80211/cg80211 as our new API for usersapce-->kernel communication?
> As you point out, wpa_supplicant already does a lot for us -- and 
> several distributions already rely on it. Some work is required but I 
> think its worth it. If we do a complete move from WE to nl80211 it 
> would be transparent to the users too.

The one blocker I can think of here is startup scripts on various
distributions.  Most of those are shell, and they usually rely on
iwconfig quite heavily.  Getting those converted to wpa_supplicant
wouldn't be a trivial amount of work, but it wouldn't be a ton either.

Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to