On 2018-10-30 11:24, Paolo Abeni wrote:
So that we can re-use it at the UDP lavel in a later patch
Hi Paolo
Minor queries -
Should it be "level" instead of "lavel"? Similar comment for the ipv6
patch as well.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/ip_input.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
index 35a786c0aaa0..72250b4e466d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
@@ -188,51 +188,50 @@ bool ip_call_ra_chain(struct sk_buff *skb)
return false;
}
-static int ip_local_deliver_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
+void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
int protocol)
Would it be better if this function was declared in include/net/ip.h &
include/net/ipv6.h rather than in net/ipv4/udp.c & net/ipv6/udp.c as in
the patch "udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection"
diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
index 72593e1..3d7fdb4 100644
--- a/include/net/ip.h
+++ b/include/net/ip.h
@@ -717,4 +717,6 @@ static inline void ip_cmsg_recv(struct msghdr *msg,
struct sk_buff *skb)
int rtm_getroute_parse_ip_proto(struct nlattr *attr, u8 *ip_proto,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
proto);
+
#endif /* _IP_H */
diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
index 8296505..4d4d2cfe 100644
--- a/include/net/ipv6.h
+++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
@@ -1101,4 +1101,8 @@ int ipv6_sock_mc_join_ssm(struct sock *sk, int
ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr, unsigned int
mode);
int ipv6_sock_mc_drop(struct sock *sk, int ifindex,
const struct in6_addr *addr);
+
+void ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
nexthdr,
+ bool have_final);
+
#endif /* _NET_IPV6_H */
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
